Current:Home > ContactSenators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800 -PrimeWealth Guides
Senators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:21:26
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two U.S. senators looking to crack down on the number of packages from China that enter the country duty-free are calling on President Joe Biden to take executive action, saying U.S. manufacturers can’t compete with low-cost competitors they say rely on forced labor and state subsidies in key sectors.
U.S. trade law allows packages bound for American consumers and valued below a certain threshold to enter tariff-free. That threshold, under a category known as “de minimis,” stands at $800 per person, per day. The majority of the imports are retail products purchased online.
Alarmed by the large increase in such shipments from China, lawmakers in both chambers have filed legislation to alter how the U.S. treats imports valued at less than $800. Now, Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Rick Scott, R-Fla., have sent a letter to Biden calling on him to end the duty-free treatment altogether for those products.
“The situation has reached a tipping point where vast sections of American manufacturing and retail are at stake if de minimis is not immediately addressed,” the senators wrote.
Brown and Scott singled out Temu, Shein and AliExpress in their letter as companies that “unfairly” benefit from the duty-free treatment of their goods. The surge in shipments, they said, hurts big box stores and other retailers in the U.S.
“This out-of-control problem impacts the safety and livelihoods of Americans, outsourcing not only our manufacturing, but also our retail sectors to China, which — as you know — systematically utilizes slave labor among other unconscionable practices to undermine our economy,” the senators said.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, which was provided to The Associated Press.
Congress raised the threshold for expedited and duty-fee imports into the U.S. from $200 back in 2016. The argument for doing so is that it speeds up the pace of commerce and lowers costs for consumers. It also allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to focus its resources on the bigger-ticket items that generate more tariff revenue for the federal government.
The change in duty-free treatment has led to a significant increase in “de minimis” shipments, from about 220 million packages that year to 685 million in fiscal year 2022.
The higher $800 threshold for duty-free treatment has strong backing from many in the business community. John Pickel, a senior director at the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade association that represents a broad range of companies, said that doing as the senators are urging would increase the amount of time it takes for shipments to arrive as they go through a more cumbersome inspection process at the border. And those products would cost more.
“The increase from $200 to $800 has not really been a significant driver in terms of volume,” Pickel said. “What’s really driving interest in the use of de minimis is the desire for consumers to access their products quickly and at a lower transaction cost.”
He said the average shipment that comes into the U.S. through the de minimis category is $55. But that cost would roughly double for the consumer if de minimis treatment no longer applied because importers would have to hire a customs broker and pay additional processing fees and the import duty.
veryGood! (41)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- The Biden administration demands that TikTok be sold, or risk a nationwide ban
- New Florida Legislation Will Help the State Brace for Rising Sea Levels, but Doesn’t Address Its Underlying Cause
- I Tried to Buy a Climate-Friendly Refrigerator. What I Got Was a Carbon Bomb.
- 'Most Whopper
- Chicago police officer shot in hand, sustains non-life-threatening injury
- China Provided Abundant Snow for the Winter Olympics, but at What Cost to the Environment?
- Warming Trends: The Cacophony of the Deep Blue Sea, Microbes in the Atmosphere and a Podcast about ‘Just How High the Stakes Are’
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- To Meet Paris Accord Goal, Most of the World’s Fossil Fuel Reserves Must Stay in the Ground
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- How Everything Turned Around for Christina Hall
- Only New Mexico lawmakers don't get paid for their time. That might change this year
- A Friday for the Future: The Global Climate Strike May Help the Youth Movement Rebound From the Pandemic
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Death of migrant girl was a preventable tragedy that raises profound concerns about U.S. border process, monitor says
- A Big Climate Warning from One of the Gulf of Maine’s Smallest Marine Creatures
- With Increased Nutrient Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, Environmentalists Hope a New Law Will Cleanup Wastewater Treatment in Maryland
Recommendation
What to watch: O Jolie night
Inside Clean Energy: Which State Will Be the First to Ban Natural Gas in New Buildings?
Gigi Hadid arrested in Cayman Islands for possession of marijuana
Judge agrees to loosen Rep. George Santos' travel restrictions around Washington, D.C.
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Bison severely injures woman in Theodore Roosevelt National Park in North Dakota
Washington state declares drought emergencies in a dozen counties
It's Equal Pay Day. The gender pay gap has hardly budged in 20 years. What gives?